The (mis)representations of the black male body in American culture continue to haunt and dominate our often misconstrued perceptions of black sexuality and identity. This is especially true in our current discussions surrounding homosexuality and notions of manhood. Let me preface by saying that when the black male body is queered, it is not simply or specifically a homosexual reference. While this may occasionally be the case (and in this essay, it is), queering is also challenging one’s understanding of the status quo. Our associations and processing of images surrounding black men and their spaces of existence are often dictated through a heteronormative lens. So when a black male thug (a normal, highly recognized reference) is sexually attracted to men, this becomes problematic.While shows like Aaron McGruder’s The Boondocks presents a satirized definition of thug homosexuality through the fictitious rapper Gangstalicious, HBO’s The Wire give us Omar Little.
This critically acclaimed series featured a plethora of characters that intersected at various points in each other’s lives, but Omar was a centralized nuisance. Anyone could be a target. His gun rained bullets freely and openly. He was a rogue with no allegiances but to himself. Omar was the most gangsta of them all because he was not predictable.
His character is an embodiment of both homophobic and homoerotic desires. Omar shatters the assumptions of black homosexual men as weak or effeminate. James Williams argues that as the “lone gay wolf,” Omar fulfills his role because the ‘hood that he inhabits is a homoerotic space. In the majority of other social constructs where homosexuality is marginalized, Omar’s sexual desires dominate and frame the expectations of the black male’s inner city existence. Williams’ observations can be extended to suggest that The Wire’s interpretation of the inner city as a hypermasculine space does not necessarily mean a hypermasculine heterosexual space. Omar is doubly feared. He is openly gay and violent. He uses his sexuality to intimidate those around him. Omar redefines masculinity through a queered lens, showing the black male gay body can also be a menacing presence.
It is interesting how the only medium available for the development of characters like Omar Little are in imagined communities where the scapegoat is the understanding that “this is just fiction.” With a limited discourse for homosexuality (especially in the black community), shows like The Wire and their representations of inner city black men provide enough critical distance where at least the prospect of a homosexual thug is somewhat accepted and open for discussion.
On the flip side of that observation also lies the notion that while fictitious, Omar is still subjugated to a realistic solution to his existence– his murder by a green, wannabe thug. On the surface, Omar’s death may seem demonstrative of the street code – “it’s all in the game.” Symbolically, however, Omar’s death signifies the silenced gay black man. He is returned to the shadows where, though lurking, he is still perceived to be a non-threatening entity.




I may need to check The Wire out. I never got into it. For more images of gay black men, you may want to go to LOGO online (if you haven't already). Once in a while, you can see a whole documentary and with Black History Month, they may replay some old ones, like one about gay hip hop artists. SPH
ReplyDeleteThis was great. I don't like the subject of the queering of black men. At Howard, all of the feminists are dead set on making every black male writer a closet homosexual.
ReplyDeleteOmar was definitely a twist in the "queering" factor. I am trying to think of examples, and if there some I am unfamiliar, but basically the gay black male we're used to seeing is the over the top, extra effeminate, snazzy dresser, with the attitude to match type guy. I'm reminded of Damon Wayans and David Alan Grier's Men on Film (three snaps in a z formation) There is no question about their orientation. But when the concept of the down low brother came about, I think it set the stage for a character like Omar. I think deep down, even though society asks like they still aren't ready to accept homosexuality, they feel more comfortable knowing who is and who isn't. In Omar's case, he was gay and it was common knowledge, but I don't remember him being openly affectionate with his partner. He was quite compassionate and loving when they were alone. If he was public with it, it wasn't that many times. But I also think that Omar's gayness was so auxiliary to the character. It didn't define him...his killer instinct and his ability to wreak havoc in the streets did. The fact that he was gay, for me, was forgotten until they showed scenes with him and his lover. And yes, everyone knew, but I bet they didn't have the balls to say it to his face!! His homosexuality didn't make him a target of Avon or even Marlo...his ability to stir up trouble and play the ends against the middle did. Would his character have been as deep or as three dimensional if he hadn't been gay?? Absolutely not. It made him one of the most captivating characters I've ever had the pleasure to watch. And the disappointing thing to me is that the untouchable man was eventally capped by a kid after all the "professionals" had failed.
ReplyDeletechallenging the status quo, I like that. Our president is even now queering, challenging the status quo, don't ask don't tell and eject it from law. I believe when prejudice is systemic and has laws backing it up people feel justified in hate crimes. I watched the show the Wire religiously, hate that it ended. Shot in Baltimore, MD we see poverty bread that crime, what breeds queers, and queer thinking, the same think that breeds emotions and people with high I cues, there has to be an intelligent design to the whole thing, my 2 cents
ReplyDeleteThis is a great opener/analysis to this new area of our culture that was once hidden but is progressively coming into light & normalcy of an everyday lifestyle depending on the geographic location (id est: Atlanta).
ReplyDeleteI never watched the show but may take a look as to better understand the scope of the medium in which it takes place to see how the networks deliver this to the masses...I can't comment as much b'c I admit I'm ignorant to this "transition" taking place but I do notice living here in Atlanta how this is becoming the norm.
This is certainly a topic that's interesting to pick up & analyze as I'm sure it hasn't been discussed in depth as of yet - or at least not in academic/school of thought settings...